spjallid.is

Þá hafi faðir konunnar greint frá því í skýrslutöku hjá lögreglu, þann 17. febrúar árið 2023, að ef bróðir konunnar hefði myrt hana, hefði það verið í góðu lagi. Hún ætti skilið refsingu í formi þess að vera lamin og fætur hennar og hendur brotnar.

Einnig hafi hann greint frá því að væru hann og synir hans „í einhverju arabalandi þá væru þeir löngu búnir að slátra konunni.“

Samkvæmt heimildum fréttastofu er um fjölskyldu frá Palestínu að ræða.

jonsig skrifaði:Hvað ætli það séu komnir margir hingað sem eru svona trúar ,menningar og greindar skaddaðir ?

There are also Bible verses from Paul's letters which support the idea that women are to have a different or submissive role to men:

"A woman should learn in quietness and full submission. I do not permit a woman to teach or to assume authority over a man; she must be quiet. For Adam was formed first, then Eve. And Adam was not the one deceived; it was the woman who was deceived and became a sinner. But women will be saved through childbearing—if they continue in faith, love and holiness with propriety."[94]
"Submit to one another out of reverence for Christ. Wives, submit yourselves to your own husbands as you do to the Lord. For the husband is the head of the wife as Christ is the head of the church, his body, of which he is the Savior. Now as the church submits to Christ, so also wives should submit to their husbands in everything. Husbands, love your wives, just as Christ loved the church and gave himself up for her to make her holy,"[95]
" 3But I want you to realize that the head of every man is Christ, and the head of the woman is man, and the head of Christ is God. 4Every man who prays or prophesies with his head covered dishonors his head. 5But every woman who prays or prophesies with her head uncovered dishonors her head—it is the same as having her head shaved. 6For if a woman does not cover her head, she might as well have her hair cut off; but if it is a disgrace for a woman to have her hair cut off or her head shaved, then she should cover her head. 7 A man ought not to cover his head, since he is the image and glory of God; but woman is the glory of man. 8For man did not come from woman, but woman from man; 9 neither was man created for woman, but woman for man. 10It is for this reason that a woman ought to have authority over her own head, because of the angels. 11Nevertheless, in the Lord woman is not independent of man, nor is man independent of woman. 12For as woman came from man, so also man is born of woman. But everything comes from God. 13Judge for yourselves: Is it proper for a woman to pray to God with her head uncovered? 14Does not the very nature of things teach you that if a man has long hair, it is a disgrace to him, 15but that if a woman has long hair, it is her glory? For long hair is given to her as a covering. 16If anyone wants to be contentious about this, we have no other practice—nor do the churches of God.

jonfr1900 skrifaði:

jonsig skrifaði:Hvað ætli það séu komnir margir hingað sem eru svona trúar ,menningar og greindar skaddaðir ?

Ég er með slæmar fréttir fyrir þig varðandi kristnina.

There are also Bible verses from Paul's letters which support the idea that women are to have a different or submissive role to men:

"A woman should learn in quietness and full submission. I do not permit a woman to teach or to assume authority over a man; she must be quiet. For Adam was formed first, then Eve. And Adam was not the one deceived; it was the woman who was deceived and became a sinner. But women will be saved through childbearing—if they continue in faith, love and holiness with propriety."[94]
"Submit to one another out of reverence for Christ. Wives, submit yourselves to your own husbands as you do to the Lord. For the husband is the head of the wife as Christ is the head of the church, his body, of which he is the Savior. Now as the church submits to Christ, so also wives should submit to their husbands in everything. Husbands, love your wives, just as Christ loved the church and gave himself up for her to make her holy,"[95]
" 3But I want you to realize that the head of every man is Christ, and the head of the woman is man, and the head of Christ is God. 4Every man who prays or prophesies with his head covered dishonors his head. 5But every woman who prays or prophesies with her head uncovered dishonors her head—it is the same as having her head shaved. 6For if a woman does not cover her head, she might as well have her hair cut off; but if it is a disgrace for a woman to have her hair cut off or her head shaved, then she should cover her head. 7 A man ought not to cover his head, since he is the image and glory of God; but woman is the glory of man. 8For man did not come from woman, but woman from man; 9 neither was man created for woman, but woman for man. 10It is for this reason that a woman ought to have authority over her own head, because of the angels. 11Nevertheless, in the Lord woman is not independent of man, nor is man independent of woman. 12For as woman came from man, so also man is born of woman. But everything comes from God. 13Judge for yourselves: Is it proper for a woman to pray to God with her head uncovered? 14Does not the very nature of things teach you that if a man has long hair, it is a disgrace to him, 15but that if a woman has long hair, it is her glory? For long hair is given to her as a covering. 16If anyone wants to be contentious about this, we have no other practice—nor do the churches of God.

Women in Christianity (Wikipedia)

Squinchy skrifaði:Já ertu mikið var við þessa þvælu hér á landi?

Alltaf jafn aumkunarvert að sjá aðila verja sora trúarbrögð með því að segja að önnur séu ekkert skárri

Squinchy skrifaði:Já ertu mikið var við þessa þvælu hér á landi?

Alltaf jafn aumkunarvert að sjá aðila verja sora trúarbrögð með því að segja að önnur séu ekkert skárri

jonfr1900 skrifaði:

jonsig skrifaði:Hvað ætli það séu komnir margir hingað sem eru svona trúar ,menningar og greindar skaddaðir ?

Ég er með slæmar fréttir fyrir þig varðandi kristnina.

There are also Bible verses from Paul's letters which support the idea that women are to have a different or submissive role to men:

"A woman should learn in quietness and full submission. I do not permit a woman to teach or to assume authority over a man; she must be quiet. For Adam was formed first, then Eve. And Adam was not the one deceived; it was the woman who was deceived and became a sinner. But women will be saved through childbearing—if they continue in faith, love and holiness with propriety."[94]
"Submit to one another out of reverence for Christ. Wives, submit yourselves to your own husbands as you do to the Lord. For the husband is the head of the wife as Christ is the head of the church, his body, of which he is the Savior. Now as the church submits to Christ, so also wives should submit to their husbands in everything. Husbands, love your wives, just as Christ loved the church and gave himself up for her to make her holy,"[95]
" 3But I want you to realize that the head of every man is Christ, and the head of the woman is man, and the head of Christ is God. 4Every man who prays or prophesies with his head covered dishonors his head. 5But every woman who prays or prophesies with her head uncovered dishonors her head—it is the same as having her head shaved. 6For if a woman does not cover her head, she might as well have her hair cut off; but if it is a disgrace for a woman to have her hair cut off or her head shaved, then she should cover her head. 7 A man ought not to cover his head, since he is the image and glory of God; but woman is the glory of man. 8For man did not come from woman, but woman from man; 9 neither was man created for woman, but woman for man. 10It is for this reason that a woman ought to have authority over her own head, because of the angels. 11Nevertheless, in the Lord woman is not independent of man, nor is man independent of woman. 12For as woman came from man, so also man is born of woman. But everything comes from God. 13Judge for yourselves: Is it proper for a woman to pray to God with her head uncovered? 14Does not the very nature of things teach you that if a man has long hair, it is a disgrace to him, 15but that if a woman has long hair, it is her glory? For long hair is given to her as a covering. 16If anyone wants to be contentious about this, we have no other practice—nor do the churches of God.

Women in Christianity (Wikipedia)

jonfr1900 skrifaði:

jonfr1900 skrifaði:

Graven skrifaði:

jonfr1900 skrifaði:

Þetta er eitt mest misheppnaðasta dæmi af eftirafarandi sem ég hef séð.

Mossi__ skrifaði:Neih! Voðalegt bergmál er í þessu holi.

jonsig skrifaði:

Graven skrifaði:

jonfr1900 skrifaði:

Þetta er eitt mest misheppnaðasta dæmi af eftirafarandi sem ég hef séð.

Hefði haldið að whataboutism kæmi frá Þýskalandi , þjóðverjar virðast geta gert allt best ,meira að segja virkilega slæmu hlutina eins og stofnun EU ,Karl Marx ,VW ,Hitler og Mambo Nº 5 með Lou Bega

jonsig skrifaði:

jonfr1900 skrifaði:

Er ekki líka dálítið málið fólk eins og þú. Með einfaldar hugmyndir um heiminn ,og auðvelt að misnota umburðarlyndið ykkar ?

Það er alltaf talað um að alkahólisti þurfi alltaf einhvern meðvirkil til að halda áfram sínu eitraða líferni.
Þetta rugl væri ekki liðið hérna án ykkar aðkomu.

Graven skrifaði:

jonfr1900 skrifaði:

Þetta er eitt mest misheppnaðasta dæmi af eftirafarandi sem ég hef séð.

Whataboutism is a propaganda technique that involves deflecting criticism by changing the subject and pointing out the flaws or wrongdoings of the accuser. The term “whataboutism” is believed to have originated in the 1970s in Northern Ireland, where it was used to describe the tactic employed by some individuals to deflect criticism of the Irish Republican Army (IRA) by pointing out the perceived wrongdoings of the British government.

Early Usage

The term “whataboutism” was first used in a 1974 letter to the editor of The Irish Times by history teacher Sean O’Conaill, who complained about “the Whatabouts”, people who defended the IRA by pointing out supposed wrongdoings of their enemy. The term gained popularity in the 1980s and 1990s, particularly in the context of the Cold War, where Soviet propagandists used the tactic to deflect criticism of the Soviet Union by pointing out the flaws of Western countries.

Soviet Union and Russia

The Soviet Union was a master of whataboutism, using the tactic to deflect criticism of its human rights abuses, political repression, and military interventions. Soviet propagandists would respond to criticism by pointing out the perceived wrongdoings of Western countries, such as racism, poverty, and imperialism. This tactic was seen as an effective way to shift the focus away from the Soviet Union’s own flaws and to portray itself as a victim of Western aggression.

jonsig skrifaði:

Frétt

Er ég að halda uppi svona aumingja með skattpeningunum mínum ? Er white saviorism að fara með landann ?

rapport skrifaði:Trúarbragð eða aðrar ástæður ofbeldis eru aukaatriði. Aðalatriðið er að fólk sem er dæmt fyrir ofbeldisglæpi og er ekki með ríkisborgararétt fái ekki landvistarleyfi og sé vísað úr landi.