Hvaða hd eru besti?
-
- Vélbúnaðarníðingur
- Póstar: 343
- Skráði sig: Mán 10. Jan 2005 22:34
- Reputation: 0
- Staðsetning: none
- Hafðu samband:
- Staða: Ótengdur
-
- Kóngur
- Póstar: 6496
- Skráði sig: Lau 29. Mar 2003 19:54
- Reputation: 315
- Staðsetning: Reykjavík
- Staða: Ótengdur
Ice master skrifaði:ég er núna með 1 maxtor disk sem ég héf átt siðan i nóvember mjög gódur en fyrsti minn var wd hann hefur ekkert crasssasd neitt en hann er 112 gb en hann er með stæla núna og segjist vera með 111 gb
á þetta ekki að vera: "hann er 112 db en hann er með stæla núna og segjist vera 111 db"
"Give what you can, take what you need."
-
- Fiktari
- Póstar: 89
- Skráði sig: Þri 09. Nóv 2004 11:50
- Reputation: 0
- Staðsetning: VRII
- Hafðu samband:
- Staða: Ótengdur
Gerði smá test á file-servernum mínum:
hda: SAMSUNG SP1614N (Capacity: 149.05 GB)
test1:
/dev/hda:
Timing buffer-cache reads: 128 MB in 1.09 seconds =117.43 MB/sec
Timing buffered disk reads: 64 MB in 1.41 seconds = 45.39 MB/sec
test2:
/dev/hda:
Timing buffer-cache reads: 128 MB in 0.87 seconds =147.13 MB/sec
Timing buffered disk reads: 64 MB in 1.64 seconds = 39.02 MB/sec
hdb: WDC WD2000JB-00DUA0 (Capacity: 186.31 GB)
test1:
/dev/hdb:
Timing buffer-cache reads: 128 MB in 0.84 seconds =152.38 MB/sec
Timing buffered disk reads: 64 MB in 1.93 seconds = 33.16 MB/sec
test2
/dev/hdb:
Timing buffer-cache reads: 128 MB in 0.94 seconds =136.17 MB/sec
Timing buffered disk reads: 64 MB in 1.76 seconds = 36.36 MB/sec
hdc: ST3200822A (Capacity: 186.31 GB)
test1:
/dev/hdc:
Timing buffer-cache reads: 128 MB in 0.79 seconds =162.03 MB/sec
Timing buffered disk reads: 64 MB in 1.67 seconds = 38.32 MB/sec
test2:
/dev/hdc:
Timing buffer-cache reads: 128 MB in 0.80 seconds =160.00 MB/sec
Timing buffered disk reads: 64 MB in 1.25 seconds = 51.20 MB/sec
hde: WDC WD1200JB-00CRA1 (Capacity: 111.79 GB)
test1:
/dev/hde:
Timing buffer-cache reads: 128 MB in 0.85 seconds =150.59 MB/sec
Timing buffered disk reads: 64 MB in 1.66 seconds = 38.55 MB/sec
test2:
/dev/hde:
Timing buffer-cache reads: 128 MB in 0.79 seconds =162.03 MB/sec
Timing buffered disk reads: 64 MB in 1.64 seconds = 39.02 MB/sec
hdf: ST3120026A (Capacity: 111.76 GB)
test1:
/dev/hdf:
Timing buffer-cache reads: 128 MB in 1.00 seconds =128.00 MB/sec
Timing buffered disk reads: 64 MB in 1.51 seconds = 42.38 MB/sec
test2:
/dev/hdf:
Timing buffer-cache reads: 128 MB in 0.91 seconds =140.66 MB/sec
Timing buffered disk reads: 64 MB in 1.19 seconds = 53.78 MB/sec
hdg: ST3200822A (Capacity: 186.31 GB
test1:
/dev/hdg:
Timing buffer-cache reads: 128 MB in 0.80 seconds =160.00 MB/sec
Timing buffered disk reads: 64 MB in 1.10 seconds = 58.18 MB/sec
test2:
/dev/hdg:
Timing buffer-cache reads: 128 MB in 0.86 seconds =148.84 MB/sec
Timing buffered disk reads: 64 MB in 1.10 seconds = 58.18 MB/sec
hdh: IBM-DTLA-305030 (Capacity: 28.63 GB)
test1:
/dev/hdh:
Timing buffer-cache reads: 128 MB in 0.82 seconds =156.10 MB/sec
Timing buffered disk reads: error
Hef mjög góða reynslu af WD, SEAGATE og SAMSUNG. Hinsvegar hafa 3 IBM diskar gefið upp öndina hjá mér. Mæli ekki með IBM né HITACHI.
kv. Ari Björnsson
hda: SAMSUNG SP1614N (Capacity: 149.05 GB)
test1:
/dev/hda:
Timing buffer-cache reads: 128 MB in 1.09 seconds =117.43 MB/sec
Timing buffered disk reads: 64 MB in 1.41 seconds = 45.39 MB/sec
test2:
/dev/hda:
Timing buffer-cache reads: 128 MB in 0.87 seconds =147.13 MB/sec
Timing buffered disk reads: 64 MB in 1.64 seconds = 39.02 MB/sec
hdb: WDC WD2000JB-00DUA0 (Capacity: 186.31 GB)
test1:
/dev/hdb:
Timing buffer-cache reads: 128 MB in 0.84 seconds =152.38 MB/sec
Timing buffered disk reads: 64 MB in 1.93 seconds = 33.16 MB/sec
test2
/dev/hdb:
Timing buffer-cache reads: 128 MB in 0.94 seconds =136.17 MB/sec
Timing buffered disk reads: 64 MB in 1.76 seconds = 36.36 MB/sec
hdc: ST3200822A (Capacity: 186.31 GB)
test1:
/dev/hdc:
Timing buffer-cache reads: 128 MB in 0.79 seconds =162.03 MB/sec
Timing buffered disk reads: 64 MB in 1.67 seconds = 38.32 MB/sec
test2:
/dev/hdc:
Timing buffer-cache reads: 128 MB in 0.80 seconds =160.00 MB/sec
Timing buffered disk reads: 64 MB in 1.25 seconds = 51.20 MB/sec
hde: WDC WD1200JB-00CRA1 (Capacity: 111.79 GB)
test1:
/dev/hde:
Timing buffer-cache reads: 128 MB in 0.85 seconds =150.59 MB/sec
Timing buffered disk reads: 64 MB in 1.66 seconds = 38.55 MB/sec
test2:
/dev/hde:
Timing buffer-cache reads: 128 MB in 0.79 seconds =162.03 MB/sec
Timing buffered disk reads: 64 MB in 1.64 seconds = 39.02 MB/sec
hdf: ST3120026A (Capacity: 111.76 GB)
test1:
/dev/hdf:
Timing buffer-cache reads: 128 MB in 1.00 seconds =128.00 MB/sec
Timing buffered disk reads: 64 MB in 1.51 seconds = 42.38 MB/sec
test2:
/dev/hdf:
Timing buffer-cache reads: 128 MB in 0.91 seconds =140.66 MB/sec
Timing buffered disk reads: 64 MB in 1.19 seconds = 53.78 MB/sec
hdg: ST3200822A (Capacity: 186.31 GB
test1:
/dev/hdg:
Timing buffer-cache reads: 128 MB in 0.80 seconds =160.00 MB/sec
Timing buffered disk reads: 64 MB in 1.10 seconds = 58.18 MB/sec
test2:
/dev/hdg:
Timing buffer-cache reads: 128 MB in 0.86 seconds =148.84 MB/sec
Timing buffered disk reads: 64 MB in 1.10 seconds = 58.18 MB/sec
hdh: IBM-DTLA-305030 (Capacity: 28.63 GB)
test1:
/dev/hdh:
Timing buffer-cache reads: 128 MB in 0.82 seconds =156.10 MB/sec
Timing buffered disk reads: error
Hef mjög góða reynslu af WD, SEAGATE og SAMSUNG. Hinsvegar hafa 3 IBM diskar gefið upp öndina hjá mér. Mæli ekki með IBM né HITACHI.
kv. Ari Björnsson
kv, arib